HumanCloning.org

HumanCloning.org

Home
Forum
Human Cloning Foundation Hails British Scientists
Paralyzed
Walk Again

Childless Couples
Essays
The Benefits of
Human Cloning

All the Reasons to
Clone Human Beings

The Top Ten Myths
about Human Cloning

Human Cloning is the Cure for Infertility
Infertility is
a Disease

Books
People
Reports
Archives
Feedback
Donate
Links
Website Links
About Us
Contact Us
Site history
Site Map
Past Books of the Month
John Kunich's Books
Copyright


Illegal Beings: Human Clones

Re: Who were the daughters of men?

bdeckba ( 09/02/2005, 00:14:10 )

First who were "the sons of the true God" mentioned at Gen6:2? The Bible implies that their marriage to the daughters of men increased the badness in the earth. Noah and his family were the only ones preserved thru the flood. So if these "sons of the true God" were merely men, the question arises, Why were their offspring "men of fame" more than those of the wicked, or of faithful Noah? Also you could ask, Why mention their marriage to the daughters of men as something special? Marriage had been taking place for 1500 years.The sons of God mentioned at Gen6:2 therefore must have been angels, spirit "sons of God". That expression is applied to angels at Job1:6, 38:7. This view is also supported by Peter, who speaks of "the spirits in prison, who had once been disobedient when the patience of God was waiting in Noah's days"- 1Pet3:19,20. Also Jude refers to "the angels that did not keep their original position but forsook their own proper dwelling place." -Jude 6. Angels had the power to materialize in human form, and some angels did so to bring messages from God.(Gen 18:1,2,8,20-22 etc) However heaven is their proper place to dwell, they have positions of service to God. (Daniel 7:9'10) To leave this abode to dwell on earth and to relinquish their assignments would in effect be rebellion against their Creator. So....if the "sons of the true God" were angels that materialized, then the "daughters of men" likely referred simply to fleshly human offspring of Man, or Adam. Hope this helps!

Previous Abstract  Reference new to old  Next Abstract





This Message is being posted for educational purposes, as well as for comment and criticism, by the visitors to the HumanCloning.org Foundation website (www.HumanCloning.org ).



Disclaimer: Information provided on this web site is for educatonal purposes only. It is not a substitute for, nor can it replace advice from your own physician.

HumanCloning.org Established December 11, 2002.




Who's Afraid of Human Cloning?



Disease Prevention and Treatment