Forum
Human Cloning Foundation Hails British Scientists
Paralyzed
Walk Again
Childless Couples
Essays
The Benefits of
Human Cloning
All the Reasons to
Clone Human Beings
The Top Ten Myths
about Human Cloning
Human Cloning is the Cure for Infertility
Infertility is
a Disease
Books
People
Reports
Archives
Feedback
Donate
Links
Website Links
About Us
Contact Us
Site history
Site Map
Past Books of the Month
John Kunich's Books
Copyright
Illegal Beings: Human Clones
AIDS vs Cloning
I_KNOW_WHOM_TO_CLONE ( 12/13/2004, 12:58:19 )TheOnE said: "We should also not make new humans unless it is for a family who can't do it themselves - like if the spouse has testicular cancer, or AIDS."Now: I think that clones (the exact copies of existing humans) should be possible to make for almost everyone (acording to strict laws about cloning that would exist).This about using technology (e.i. technology invented during process of inventing cloning technologies) to produce a child for those heterosexual couples who can't have them normaly is ALL RIGHT; but this with AIDS... - I can't completely agree with it.Why?.. Well... Although there is a possibility that someone gets AIDS because of someone elses non-sexual mistake (- I'm talking about blood transfusion for example), AIDS is majorly being acquired due to extremely amoral and/or unconsiderate behaviour of human beings (more: animals than human beings).For those who are the real inocent-ones - overcoming AIDS problem (in any way; and the one mentioned!) should be affordable. Those amoral(?) (e.i. one-night-standers, sex without love etc.) for them it should be completely different story... If the cure for AIDS is to be found it shouldn't be free (for all), or for some relatively small (affordable) amount of money. The only MORAL thing to do is to put some astronomical price (like: 300.000$) even if it's a simple (e.g. 10 ml) injection (actually costing e.g. 10$). Why? Because making free cure from AIDS would be an incouragement for amoral behaviour that already makes a lot of problems in society... Think about it! They get the contraception pills and they f*** on the streets - never mind whom, just "Tra-la, la, la-la" f***ing eachother's brains out like animals. All the human values dismissed! What! Even if they get AIDS they can cure themselves, like it is a common flue! So - no problem, never mind the AIDS! Bring it on!The question arises though: how could one say that it is the truth what the infected-one says (about how did he/she acquire the infection); and would there be over-the-counter sale (at low(er) price) for the "humanism" cause (humanism?! well... isn't that an irony?... ...); not to mention revanchism of the amoral-ones against the society that created such cure-selective laws... So!1.) AIDS is posing a threath to people - let it stay that way! and 2.) Most (and I'm saying: MOST (not all)) of those who have it are themselves guilty for it - e.i. they deserved it. They don't have the reason to blame the society for their troubles.And those stories that AIDS infected parents are the guilty ones, and that their children are the inocent is bulls***. Their children are their (THEIR!) genitical successors, for Christ's sake!!! (far from it that I don't understand the personal tragedy of such children!, but...) Those who are amoral (in such way), should deserve the greatest punishment in this biological world we are all part of: not being able to continue their line of specie, their family tree, not being able to pass their genes healthy onto their future generation. Their gens SHOULD be killed by AIDS (what ever it means)! That's justice. Why? Because - think about it: they've got AIDS (originaly) from someone who's not worthy of her/his love, or even whom they don't LOVE at all - why did they do IT with such person?!***************************************** There are people who's human values are at it's greatest. They are an example of what human being IS and should be! Those people should be respected, not humiliated and discriminated by those whose oppinions border with those of the animals. There is concept of true love, for example, you know - the human thing. So - the most human humans should survive, and the less human humans should be exterminated. *****************************************Actualy - long time ago someone said "If there wasn't God, then one should be invented." (because there are abnoctious excuses for people (and there always will be) who don't have human values embeded in themselves so you must use their stupidity and superstition in order to make them act human, to literaly "force the humanism inside their heads"). Just like that someone said "If there wasn't God, then one should be invented.", I say: If there wasn't AIDS, then someone should have invented it!----------------------------Cure for AIDS should NOT EVER(!)BE FOUND! Let amoral humans suffer, let them DIE; asking themselves for the rest of their miserable filthy lifes where did the things went wrong for them. Let the children of those infected blame their parents for giving them lives. That is the justice.BUT MOSTLY(!!!): LET THE INOCENT BE SPARED!!If people were more moral and ethical then AIDS infections would be reduced.
This Message is being posted for educational purposes, as well as for comment and criticism, by the visitors to the HumanCloning.org Foundation website (www.HumanCloning.org ).
Disclaimer: Information provided on this web site is for educatonal purposes only. It is not a substitute for, nor can it replace advice from your own physician.
HumanCloning.org™ Established December 11, 2002.
Who's Afraid of Human Cloning?
Disease Prevention and Treatment