HumanCloning.org

HumanCloning.org

Home
Forum
Human Cloning Foundation Hails British Scientists
Paralyzed
Walk Again

Childless Couples
Essays
The Benefits of
Human Cloning

All the Reasons to
Clone Human Beings

The Top Ten Myths
about Human Cloning

Human Cloning is the Cure for Infertility
Infertility is
a Disease

Books
People
Reports
Archives
Feedback
Donate
Links
Website Links
About Us
Contact Us
Site history
Site Map
Past Books of the Month
John Kunich's Books
Copyright
Archives New to Old
Archives Old to New


Illegal Beings: Human Clones

Duration of in vitro maturation of recipient oocytes affects blastocyst development of cloned porcine em

Holker M, Petersen B, Hassel P, Kues WA, Lemme E, Lucas-Hahn A, Niemann H

Cloning Stem Cells. 2005;7(1):35-44..

Department of Biotechnology, Institute for Animal Breeding, Mariensee, Germany.

This study investigated the effects of different incubation periods for oocyte maturation and contact inhibition of donor cells as well as different osmolarities for storage of recipient oocytes on fusion rates, cleavage rates, and blastocyst yields of porcine somatic nuclear transfer (SCNT) derived embryos. In addition, the in vivo developmental potential of cloned embryos derived from the most promising SCNT protocol was tested by transfer to recipient gilts. Storage of in vitro-matured oocytes for 7.5 h in calcium-free TL-HEPES medium at 295 or 320 mOsmol prior to activation yielded significantly (p < 0.05) higher parthenogenetic blastocyst rates compared to storage in TL-HEPES with an osmolarity of 270 mOsmol (24.4 +/- 3.0% and 26.2 +/- 4.3% vs. 18.3 +/- 6.4%, respectively, mean +/- SD) and improved the visibility of the polar body. Electrical fusion of fibroblasts to enucleated oocytes matured for 38, 40, or 42 h resulted in similar fusion and cleavage rates (74.8-84.4%). However, nuclear transfer with oocytes matured for 40 h in vitro yielded significantly higher (p < 0.05) development to the blastocyst stage after 7 days of culture (14.7 +/- 1.7%) than with oocytes matured for 38 h (9.5 +/- 2.1%) or 42 h (5.1 +/- 2.1%). Contact inhibition for 24, 48, or 72 h significantly (p < 0.05) increased the proportion of cells at G0/G1 compared with cycling fibroblasts. However, duration of contact inhibition of the donor cells for either 24, 48, or 72 h had no effect on blastocyst rates of SCNT embryos. Four gilts received an average of 150 SCNT embryos (range 138-161) reconstructed with oocytes matured for 40 h; two of these became pregnant; one of them went to term and farrowed four piglets on day 115 of pregnancy. Microsatellite analysis confirmed that the clones were genetically identical with the donor cells. These results show that changes of the in vitro maturation protocol may affect in vitro development of reconstructed porcine embryos, while duration of the contact inhibition period plays a minor role for the success of porcine SCNT. The effects on in vivo development are yet to be determined.
Previous Abstract  Reference new to old  Next Abstract





This Message is being posted for educational purposes, as well as for comment and criticism, by the visitors to the HumanCloning.org Foundation website (http://www.humancloning.org ).



Disclaimer: This abstract is being posted for educational purposes, as well as for comment and criticism, by the visitors to the Human Cloning Foundation website (www.HumanCloning.org ). This abstract is representative of a larger article that is indexed on Medline.

The Human Cloning Foundation was established February, 1988. .




Who's Afraid of Human Cloning?



Disease Prevention and Treatment