Forum
Human Cloning Foundation Hails British Scientists
Paralyzed
Walk Again
Childless Couples
Essays
The Benefits of
Human Cloning
All the Reasons to
Clone Human Beings
The Top Ten Myths
about Human Cloning
Human Cloning is the Cure for Infertility
Infertility is
a Disease
Books
People
Reports
Archives
Feedback
Donate
Links
Website Links
About Us
Contact Us
Site history
Site Map
Past Books of the Month
John Kunich's Books
Copyright
Archives New to Old
Archives Old to New
Illegal Beings: Human Clones
Ethical attitudes on human cloning among professionals in Taiwan and the policy implications for regul
Yang CM, Chung CC, Lu MS, Lin CF, Chen JSIssues Law Med. 2005 Summer;21(1):35-44..
School of Healthcare Administration, Taipei Medical University, and Taipei Municipal Wan Fang Hospital, Taiwan.
This research focused on understanding the attitudes toward human cloning in Taiwan among professionals in healthcare, law, and religion. DESIGN: The study was conducted utilizing a structured questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: 220 healthcare professionals from two regional hospitals located in Taipei, 351 religious professionals in the northern Taiwan and 711 legal professionals were selected by to receive questionnaires. The valid response rate is 42.1% MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The questions were generated by an expert panel and represented major arguments in the human cloning debate. There were a total of six Likert scaled questions in the questionnaire. The responses were coded from 1 to 5 with 1 representing strong opposition to human cloning, 3 representing a neutral attitude; and 5 representing a strong favorable attitude toward human cloning. RESULTS: Healthcare professionals had the highest overall average score of 2.14 and the religious professionals had the lowest average at 1.58. All three categories of respondents' attitude toward cloning ranged from mild opposition to strong opposition to human cloning. The religious professionals were more strongly opposed to cloning. Age, education, and religion significantly influenced attitudes toward cloning. Professionals between fifty-one and sixty years old, those with less education, and Roman Catholic professionals were more strongly opposed to cloning. CONCLUSIONS: Religious professionals were more strongly opposed to human cloning than professionals in healthcare or law. Younger professionals as an age group demonstrated less opposition to human cloning. Regulation of human cloning will be influenced by professionals in healthcare, law, and religion, and the regulatory environment chosen now will play a pivotal role in influencing the acceptance of human cloning in the future.
This Message is being posted for educational purposes, as well as for comment and criticism, by the visitors to the HumanCloning.org Foundation website (http://www.humancloning.org ).
Disclaimer: This abstract is being posted for educational purposes, as well as for comment and criticism, by the visitors to the Human Cloning Foundation website (www.HumanCloning.org ). This abstract is representative of a larger article that is indexed on Medline.
The Human Cloning Foundation was established February, 1988. .
Who's Afraid of Human Cloning?
Disease Prevention and Treatment