Re: nonhuman ape carriers for clones


Re: nonhuman ape carriers for clones -- monoclone
Posted by Carol Wilson , Tue, Apr 30, 2002, 21:48:47 Post Reply Top of the thread Main Forum
To me, that is sounding pretty bizarre to use non-humans to carry humans.

Right off hand I would be against it, unless it is somehow absolutely necessary.

Also I think the "precautionary principle" (as discussed in the John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton books --- see below for reference*) should be applied to this sort of experimentation (should it ever occur).

A major problem with using anything non-human to carry the fetus (or whatever it is being cultured) is not that this is necessarily unethical of itself, but it opens the door much wider for ambivalence regarding ethical concerns.

This is because as long as a human (woman) is carrying the fetus, there is little chance of finding women who will be "used" to do anything which would not be in the best interests of whatever it is being cloned.

Right off hand, using non-humans sounds to me like a way to avoid ethical considerations.

Sorry I cannot comment on the rest of your concerns, but they do not concern things of which I am personally knowledgeable.
_______________________________
*The particular book which discusses "the precautionary principle" is entitled "Trust Us, We're Experts." It can be found in the www.prwatch.org website.


Modified by Carol Wilson at Tue, Apr 30, 2002, 22:21:48
Author Profile | Edit | Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Original Post Top of the thread Return to this forum's home page!