HumanCloning.org

HumanCloning.org

Home
Forum
Human Cloning Foundation Hails British Scientists
Paralyzed
Walk Again

Childless Couples
Essays
The Benefits of
Human Cloning

All the Reasons to
Clone Human Beings

The Top Ten Myths
about Human Cloning

Human Cloning is the Cure for Infertility
Infertility is
a Disease

Books
People
Reports
Archives
Feedback
Donate
Links
Website Links
About Us
Contact Us
Site history
Site Map
Past Books of the Month
John Kunich's Books
Copyright


Illegal Beings: Human Clones

What ethical standard should publishers and authors meet?

SC ( 12/09/2003, 00:15:58 )

The main question I've been asking myself after reading this advertisement is how harsh my criticism of it should be. I haven't read the book, but based on what I've read here, I'm reluctant to support an author and publisher that use the promotional tactics displayed here. This seems more like controversy for controversy's (and profit's) sake than a responsible examination of cloning issues. The book may be quite different from the blurb, but many people are likely to see only the advertisement and never read the book.Even if the book and/or interviews give a favorable view of human cloning, the questions posed here and by the author (on the website I found, at least) are the literary equivalent of entrapment; the author and publisher might fight ignorance and prejudice, but ignorance and prejudice that they encouraged in the first place.As far as insight or an earnest attempt to seek the truth are concerned, what I've read above doesn't promise much value for the money. People who want answers to the sorts of questions posed in this advertisement can find them posted here for free. That is, if they haven't come up with some good answers of their own already, or moved past the point where they even ask such questions anymore. Most people who come to this site pose questions such as those posed in the advertisement because they don't know any better, or because they want to know better. The author and publishers either should know better, or already do, and I consider it dishonest and immoral for them to pretend otherwise. I have chosen to use the word "immoral" here because morality is more commonly associated with what is best for society at large, whereas the word "ethics" is used more often in a professional sense; an employee following the ethical guidelines designed to bring profit to a corporation may not be making a net positive contribution to society as a whole if the corporation generates profit at the expense of others.

Previous Abstract  Reference new to old  Next Abstract





This Message is being posted for educational purposes, as well as for comment and criticism, by the visitors to the HumanCloning.org Foundation website (www.HumanCloning.org ).



Disclaimer: Information provided on this web site is for educatonal purposes only. It is not a substitute for, nor can it replace advice from your own physician.

HumanCloning.org™ Established December 11, 2002.




Who's Afraid of Human Cloning?



Disease Prevention and Treatment